Paste a link
Any supported platform, whatever the uploader published.
Most people searching for a 4K video downloader do not want four times the pixels. They want the copy that does not look soft. Those turn out to be different things.
Worth saying plainly before you paste anything: this site saves at 720p and no higher. If you specifically need a 2160p master — you are grading footage, cutting it into a project, putting it on something enormous — a desktop application is the honest answer, and no browser tool is going to serve you better.
For everyone else the arithmetic is unkind to enormous resolutions. A four-minute music video at 2160p runs to roughly 340 MB. The same video at 720p is under 40 MB. On a phone screen, about six inches away, the two are indistinguishable: your eye cannot resolve the extra detail at that size, so the only difference you actually experience is a nine-fold wait and the storage it eats.
That gap also explains why so many sites advertising huge resolutions quietly hand over something smaller. Every platform stores its top resolutions as a video-only stream with the sound kept separately, and rejoining them costs real processing. A tool that skips the merge gives you a silent file. A tool that cannot afford the bandwidth gives you a downgrade and says nothing about it. Writing the ceiling on the page seemed better than letting you discover it in the file.
Any supported platform, whatever the uploader published.
Rows run from 720p down to 360p, each with its size.
Transfer, a brief merge, then the file is yours.
No. The ceiling is 720p measured on the short side, so a landscape video arrives as 1280x720 and a vertical one as 720x1280. Anything published above that comes down to the ceiling.
Sending you the file is the one thing that costs this site real money, and the bill scales with megabytes. The ceiling is what keeps the tool free and the queue short. Re-encoding everything smaller instead would cost picture quality and processing time; capping costs neither on the screens people actually use.
On a phone or tablet, almost certainly not. On a large monitor at full screen a careful eye will find softer edges on fine detail — small text, foliage, distant faces. Whether that matters depends entirely on what you are saving it for.
Mostly YouTube. Instagram, TikTok, Facebook and Pinterest re-encode what people upload to around 1080p, so the enormous resolutions those sites get credited with rarely exist to begin with.
A desktop application, with your own disk and your own bandwidth behind it. That is the right tool for keeping a master copy. This is the right tool for saving something to watch.
Yes, and that is part of the point. Very high resolutions are usually encoded as VP9 or AV1, which older phones and TVs choke on. What this site hands over is H.264 in an MP4 — the format essentially everything made in the last fifteen years can open without a converter.
One tool per job, so each page tells you exactly what that platform can and cannot do.